A generation scarred by the cuts of austerity

Published on Wednesday, 13 June 2012
A generation scarred by the cuts of austerity

At the risk of sounding nostalgic, some things it seems really were better in the good old days. Depending upon our age, we might quibble about the music or the fashion styles, but there's one thing we can all probably agree on – the job prospects facing young people today are worse than ever.

The International Labour Organization, in its Global Employment Trends for Youth 2012, says an estimated 75 million people between the ages of 15 and 24 will be without work in 2012, an increase of more than 4 million since 2007. A further 6.4 million young people have become so frustrated that they've simply given up looking for work.

The report goes so far as to call today's youth cohort a "scarred" generation.

That's because young workers are increasingly caught in a dangerous mix of high unemployment, increased inactivity and precarious work in developed countries, as well as high working poverty rates in the developing word.

Regionally, the report paints an almost universally grim picture:

In developed economies the situation is even worse than suggested by the 18 per cent youth unemployment rate projected for this year, due to a massive drop-out from the labour force.In the CIS, Central and South-Eastern Europe region, the youth unemployment rate dropped only slightly to 17.6 per cent in 2011.In North Africa, youth unemployment rose by 5 percentage points following the Arab Spring, leaving 27.9 per cent of young people jobless in 2011. In the Middle East the rate was 26.5 per cent.In Latin America and the Caribbean the youth unemployment rate rose sharply during the economic crisis, from 13.7 per cent in 2008 to 15.6 in 2009. It decreased to 14.3 per cent in 2011, but no further improvement is expected in the medium term.Even in the rapidly developing countries of East Asia, the unemployment rate was 2.8 times higher for young people than for adults.

Now, you would think that given the sheer scale of the crisis in youth unemployment that governments would be taking some strong action to deal with the problem. Think again. As the ILO report notes, the current focus on austerity measures in large parts of the world is putting a renewed squeeze on young people. Government cutbacks are applying a brake on job creation and pushing up already high youth unemployment rates. Meanwhile, cuts to education and training budgets in many countries have led to rising tuition fees, fewer education and training spaces, and lost opportunities.

Understating the case, the ILO report concludes: "The austerity measures currently implemented in a wide range of developed economies bode ill for a quick recovery of youth labor markets."

So, what should be done? Clearly, governments need to take youth unemployment seriously. Providing employers with hiring incentives and improving social protection measures for young people are part of the solution. But ultimately, we need to focus on growth, not austerity. Governments need to get the message that the priority now must be on coordinating expansionary fiscal and economic initiatives with new investments in education and training to fast-track youth into the labour market.

If the ILO figures are correct, there are at least seventy-five million reasons why we need to act today.

Last modified on Monday, 16 July 2012

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

David Robinson

David Robinson is a special advisor on higher and vocational education and training with EI. He is also the associate executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, representing academic and general staff at colleges and universities across Canada.

Other blog posts

Why Economic Evidence Cannot Help Establish Post-2015 Priorities

Written by
on Tuesday, 21 October 2014

As part of the broader 2015 landscape, various initiatives and processes are taking place. One of these initiatives, the Copenhagen Consensus Center, had the idea of carrying out cost-benefit analysis on the different targets that have been debated over the past year. One of these analyses was on education specifically and on which EI was asked to give feedback. Below is an adapted version of a response paper by Steve Klees in which he reflects on the education analysis carried…

Read more...

Back to the dark days

on Monday, 16 July 2012

Public financing of universities in Spain will be cut by more than half at the end of 2012. And, in 2015, the Spanish government will reduce public expenditure in education to 3.9 per cent of GPD. Spain is currently placed among those countries with low public expenditure in education. That situation may not change for decades, particularly after the cuts and reforms carried out by the conservative government.   5% of GDP in 2009 The highest level of public expenditure…

Read more...
blog archive