Friday, 15 June 2012

Financial servility and the education crisis in southern Europe

Financial servility and the education crisis in southern Europe Image by XYZ via Flickr

In Southern Europe, we are immersed in a deep financial crisis. This is largely due to greed within the banking sector in this hyper-liberalised financial system, a growth model highly dependent on speculation and the 'bad government' prevalent in the region that has tolerated, if not pro-actively fuelled, this erratic development model.

In response to the financial crisis, Southern European governments have embraced austerity measures characterised by significant cuts in fundamental social services such as health and education.

Education cuts

Spain is a good example of the scale of educational cuts in the region. Public education system resources have been dramatically reduced in recent weeks. This process has been implemented through executive orders which have been passed without any parliamentary or public debate.

So far, Spain has decided to:

  • Cut the education budget by more than €3 billion
  • Lay off thousands of teachers
  • Increase the ratio of students per class by one quarter
  • Reduce public contributions to childcare
  • Increase the number of leave days before a teacher can be substituted (which, in practice, will lead to an increase in teaching hours)
  • Increase student fees by 66 per cent
  • Reduce the number of scholarships
  • Introduce fees for vocational training for the first time
  • Drastically cut research budgets
  • Reduce extra support classes for students with special needs


As we can see, the number of changes that the Spanish educational system is suffering from at all levels in such a short period of time is dizzying. However, we should bear in mind that similar policies are also being implemented in countries such as Portugal, Italy and Greece.

While it is true that these cuts have been imposed to a large extent by the so-called Troika, represented by the European Central Bank (ECB), the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), these policies fit perfectly with the ideologies of conservative and/or technocratic governments which dominate Southern European, for whom those issues of equity and social cohesion which could contribute significantly to quality public education are far from their programme priorities.

Cuts and their main effects

The size of the cuts being applied will almost inevitably have negative effects on educational quality and, therefore, future opportunities for many people. However, the political right insists that cutting spending is not incompatible with the effectiveness of the education system. In multiple appearances in the media, the Spanish Education Minister, José I. Wert, has emphasised that "the measures taken in education do not substantially impair teaching quality". Such statements are inopportune and, moreover, inaccurate for several reasons.

  1. Many of the measures being implemented directly affect the quality of education. We refer to, for example, the reduction in the number of teachers within the system, the reduction in teaching hours for extra support classes (usually aimed at children with learning difficulties), the increase in teaching hours (which reduces time previously used for teamwork, coordination and class preparation) or increased class sizes. Regarding the latter, there is ample evidence that smaller class sizes make it easier to give pupils individualised support, especially those from socially marginalised backgrounds.
  2. Higher costs and challenges associated with educating an increasingly impoverished population are significant indirect effects of the prevailing budgetary austerity both in education and extracurricular activities. The financial crisis is being dealt with by labour deregularisation and deficit reduction resulting in a significant increase in unemployment, informal and precarious work, and poverty. According to a recent report by UNICEF, the level of child poverty has risen significantly in Southern European countries such as Portugal, Spain and Italy, where millions of children are already living in vulnerable situations. Numerous research studies show that a deterioration in children and young people's material and social conditions negatively affects their learning opportunities. Therefore, the gradual impoverishment of the population seems to indicate that the educational level of the countries in question will lower substantially. In fact, school systems need more educational and material resources to promote learning in those children experiencing socio-economic difficulties. But, paradoxically, the prevailing austerity measures not only prevent school systems from having the resources they need to meet these new challenges, but take away the ones they already have.
  3. The fact that the cuts affect equality in education will also negatively affect the learning outcomes of children. The latest OECD PISA* report shows that the educational systems which score the highest on this international test (which evaluates and compares 15-year-old students from many countries around the world on various subjects) are the ones that have the smallest differences between the highest and the lowest marks. In other words, the countries with more equitable education systems secure better PISA scores. Less equitable systems get poorer results on average. Austerity measures affect our most vulnerable children's education. They increase educational inequalities both directly and indirectly and, therefore, reduce educational quality. Furthermore, since measures to promote equality are expensive, budget cuts will prevent them from being implemented.


Conclusion: cuts affect children's education

In Southern European countries, cuts in education are implemented with the short-term goal of paying off debt. These cuts are objectionable because they make it difficult for countries to fulfil their obligations to ensure the right to quality education. Even though our leaders try to play down the effects of the cuts, they will affect the experience and educational opportunities of many children, especially those who are from poorer backgrounds or have learning difficulties.

To overcome this crisis and also to lay the foundations for a more cohesive society and a more innovative and social economy, we need strong, equitable public education systems. Unfortunately, the financial servitude of Southern European rulers and their elitism when it comes to understanding education lead us in the opposite direction towards an inferior, more fragmented and unequal educational system.

*OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development); PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment). The author wishes to thank Adrián Zancajo, Xavier Bonal y Mª del Mar Griera for their comments in a previous version of this post.

Last modified on Wednesday, 04 July 2012
Antoni Verger

Antoni Verger is a Ramón y Cajal Researcher and a Marie Curie Fellow at the Department of
Sociology of the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). Hi is a member of the 'Globalisation, Education and Social Policies' UAB research centre. His main areas of expertise are the global governance of education and education privatization (antoni.verger@uab.cat).

Other blog posts

Should Public Money Be Used for Private Schools?

Written by
on Monday, 14 October 2013

Over the past three years, the Department for International Development (DFID) has made the controversial move to support low-cost private schools in some countries, such as Nigeria, Ghana, or Pakistan, where public education systems are in desperate need of investment. In doing this, the DFID is following in the ideological footsteps of the World Bank. Indeed, a recent DFID Guidance Note on low-cost private schools argues that such schools have a key role to play in expanding education provision, despite…

Read more...

Contesting Crisis and (Neo)Liberal Reforms in the Former Socialist Bloc

Written by
on Monday, 11 June 2012

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the rhetoric of "crisis" has dominated education policy debates in the former socialist bloc countries. The titles of numerous education policy briefs, studies, and reports made this clearly visible—A Generation at Risk: Children in the Central Asian Republics of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan (Asian Development Bank 1998), Youth in Central Asia: Losing the New Generation (International Crisis Group 2003), and Public Spending on Education in the CIS-7 Countries: The Hidden Crisis (World…

Read more...

Teacher supply gaps and the looming quality crisis in developing countries

Written by
on Wednesday, 26 September 2012

It is widely recognized that while the number and recruitment of teachers has grown significantly since 1970, recruitment rates have stalled and moreover have not kept pace with expanding enrolments.[1]  This has led to a worldwide shortage of teachers that is particularly acute in developing countries.  Recent estimates posit that 1.9 million additional teachers are required to realize universal primary education, more than half of them in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA).[2]  As such, many countries in SSA must augment teacher recruitment…

Read more...

A crisis of cost: Economic constraints to hiring more and better teachers

Written by
on Friday, 05 October 2012

My previous post (“Teacher supply gaps and the looming quality crisis in developing countries”) looked at how supply gaps in quality teachers and teacher training exacerbate the well-known global teacher shortfall in both primary and post-primary phases.  We are quickly finding out, unfortunately though not surprisingly, that there are no quick fixes to simultaneously expand the teacher workforce and upgrade their pedagogical skills in low- and lower-middle income countries.  Simply spending more money is neither feasible nor necessarily desirable in…

Read more...
blog archive

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.