Hidden privatisation(s) in public education: the case of Private Tutoring

Published on Wednesday, 25 July 2012
Hidden privatisation(s) in public education: the case of Private Tutoring Image by cityyear via Flickr

Privatisation in public education has become the focus of much-needed analysis, highlighting the ethical dangers associated with education reforms promoting competition, choice, performance management, private-public partnerships, and commercialization in education* However, one of the most widespread (yet mostly invisible) forms of privatisation in public education – private tutoring – has generally remained outside of policy review.

Billion-dollar industry
According to 2012 estimates, private tutoring constituted a US$11 billion industry in the United States alone. It has become a worldwide phenomenon that has affected communities across North and South America, Western and Eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa.

Private tutoring was traditionally used to help individual students meet specific educational interests and needs (such as providing extra assistance or enrichment). Today, families increasingly rely on private tutoring to supplement public and private schooling, whether to prepare for high-stakes examinations or pursue extra-curricular activities.

Worth highlighting

Two issues deserve special attention.

First, the tightening of budgets in many educational systems across the world has negatively affected public school curricula. Arts, music, drama, and physical education have been systematically eliminated from public school curricula. The responsibility for nurturing the “whole person” has shifted into the private sphere, where private tutoring provides the type of holistic and comprehensive education that is no longer available in public schools. However, such education is only accessible to families who can afford to pay for it, leaving many children without an opportunity to fully develop their interests and talents.

Second, private tutoring is eating into what has been left of the impoverished public school curriculum itself. In some countries (for example, Azerbaijan and Cambodia among many others), it is practically impossible to complete the state-mandated curricula without enlisting private tutoring services. In these countries, only part of the state curriculum is available during the official school hours -  the rest of the state curriculum is being unofficially “sold” through private tutoring lessons. Often, teachers offer private tutoring lessons to their own students after school hours on school grounds. While the reasons for such an irregular “merging” of public schooling and private tutoring vary – ranging from insufficient school hours in Cambodia to an overloaded curriculum in Azerbaijan to low teacher salaries in many countries – the outcomes are the same. The complete public school curriculum is available only in combination with private tutoring, leaving behind many students who are unable to pay the full price for education.

Reproduces inequality
Private tutoring is generally unaffordable to families from lower socioeconomic groups and rural areas. This has serious implications for educational equity. It reproduces inequality and privilege. This clearly undermines education’s main purpose – to equalise society.

Private tutoring is a type of “hidden” and practically invisible privatisation of public education. It needs to be urgently confronted and critically examined by scholars, policymakers, and communities.

*See Ball, S. & Youdell, D. (2007). Hidden privatisation in public education. Brussels: Education International.

Last modified on Tuesday, 01 October 2013

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated. HTML code is not allowed.

Iveta Silova

Iveta Silova is an Associate Professor and Director of Comparative and International Education program at the College of Education, Lehigh University. Her research and publications cover a range of issues critical to understanding post-socialist education transformation processes in the context of globalization, including gender equity trends in Eastern/Central Europe and Central Asia, minority/multicultural education policies in the former Soviet Union, as well as the scope, nature, and implications of private tutoring in a cross-national perspective. She is the co-editor (with Noah W. Sobe) of a quarterly peer-reviewed journal "European Education: Issues and Studies."

Other blog posts

Business, As Usual, Distorts Education (Part II)

Written by
on Tuesday, 10 September 2013

In Part I, I argued that neoliberalism's narrow focus on business and the market system has distorted education through:  blaming education for not meeting the needs of business; marketing entrepreneurship instead of creating good jobs; relying on a very limited human capital framework; and making an unrealistic connection between education and economic growth.  Part II further elaborates neoliberal distortions.   Direct Investment.  Business does not only influence educational discourses, as discussed previously.  Education itself has become big business.  It is…

Read more...

Stop precarious work!

Written by
on Thursday, 04 October 2012

Mr. Dyokwe worked as an employee of a factory in Cape Town, South Africa beginning in 2000. In 2003, he was asked by his supervisor to go and “sign a form”. When he went to the office at the address provided, he was told that he would have to go to work for a “labour broker” if he wanted to keep his job. He returned to his position, but with a lower salary.  And, in 2009, he found himself on…

Read more...
blog archive