Open Access: Making Knowledge Priceless

Published on Wednesday, 01 March 2017
Open Access: Making Knowledge Priceless Credits: vic xia (Flickr)

Try this thought experiment for a moment. Imagine you’re a budding author who has laboured for many long hours crafting what you believe is a masterful manuscript. You send it to a publisher who is very interested. They’re willing to publish your tour de force, but only under the following conditions: they will own the copyright, and while they will charge people who want to read your creation and reap all the profits that may ensue, you’ll receive no payment.

If it sounds like the worst deal on earth, it is. Yet, that’s precisely what’s happening in the academic publishing world. Academics, most of who are working in public or not-for-profit institutions, are churning out an avalanche of research papers every year. But when it comes time to publish, they turn over their work and their copyright to for-profit publishing companies who then sell those papers to libraries and others in the academic community for inflated subscription fees.

And just how much money is to be made by this one-sided arrangement? Elsevier, one of the giants in the industry, reported a whopping 37% net profit margin in 2015. That’s equivalent to Facebook, but more than Pfizer (14%), Apple (23%), or Citigroup (21%).

For years, many academics and higher education institutions have understandingly been unhappy with this state of affairs. And until recently, they didn’t have many choices. Today, however, many are embracing the idea of open access as a way to challenge the industry’s stranglehold on academic publishing.

Open access refers to the practice of authors voluntarily making their work freely available on the internet, and on other platforms, for any person to read and use. The concept of open access has its origin in three main manifestos: the Budapest Open Access Initiative of February 2002, the Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing in June 2003, and the Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities of October 2003.

The principle that animates the open access movement is that knowledge is a public good, and that everyone should have unrestricted, free access to scholarly research—much of which is publicly funded. Making the research publicly available to everyone—free of charge and without most copyright and licensing restrictions—will, proponents say, accelerate scientific research efforts and allow authors to reach a larger number of readers.

Of course, this movement poses a serious risk to publishers like Elsevier. So it’s not surprising that they’re fighting back. Elsevier, for instance, initially supported the Research Works Act, a U.S. Congressional bill that contained provisions to prohibit open-access mandates for federally funded research.

More recently, Elsevier came under fire in 2015 for a new hosting and sharing policy that would prevent authors from sharing their articles on open access platforms for up to 4 years. Because of this, 60 German academic institutions have decided to cancel their subscriptions to Elsevier’s journals in order to negotiate better open access provisions. This follows on the heels of a similar boycott by Dutch universities that resulted in a new deal on open access being negotiated with Elsevier.

At Education International’s Further and Higher Education and Research Conference last November, participants debated these issues and discussed a proposed policy on open access that will go to the EI Board meeting. The policy calls on EI affiliates to encourage members to voluntarily publish in open access journals and to understand the negative impact of publishing in, or serving as editors for, journals that do not support open access.

Educators and students can show their support for open access by taking part in Open Access Week this March 27-31. Events and activities are being organized on campuses around the globe to raise awareness about why research and education materials should be more freely shared and accessible.

The fundamental principle at stake in open access is that knowledge that is produced as a public good should be available to the public who paid for it.

Last modified on Wednesday, 01 March 2017

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

David Robinson

David Robinson is the executive director of the Canadian Association of University Teachers, representing academic and general staff at colleges and universities across Canada.

Other blog posts

Unemployment and the Skills Gap Myth

Written by
on Tuesday, 05 February 2013

The American social reformer and women’s suffragist Jane Addams noted in 1910 that of all the aspects of social misery nothing is as heartbreaking as unemployment. To be without meaningful work is not only financially devastating, but also mentally and physically damaging. Unemployed workers and their families are twice as likely as those with jobs to experience poor self-esteem, depression, and anxiety – conditions that routinely led to serious physical health problems. Added to this is the destabilizing impact of…


Turkish educators after the coup: ‘We will win’.

Written by
on Tuesday, 06 December 2016

Earlier this year, on the night of 15th July, there was an attempted coup in Turkey. The coup was quickly defeated and immediately afterwards the government imposed a State of Emergency. The government claims the State of Emergency is intended to defend and stabilise democracy. In reality it provides cover for hugely undemocratic actions aimed at shutting down the government’s critics. Opposition politicians and many journalists have found themselves attacked and sometimes imprisoned, but thousands of educators, in schools and…

blog archive