Privatizing Teacher Solidarity: Education Freelancing in the Former Socialist Bloc

Published on Tuesday, 13 November 2012
Image by World Bank Photo Collection via Flickr Image by World Bank Photo Collection via Flickr Image by World Bank Photo Collection via Flickr

With the advent of the market forces in the post-socialist education space, the logic of service provision has become commonplace in schools. For many teachers, “education entrepreneurship” has become a part of the individual and collective professional identity formation. In Lithuania, for example, the 2003 Law on Education codified the concept of a “freelance teacher,” whereby teachers can become licensed to engage in private educational activities on an individual basis. According to the Law, freelance teachers have the right to work according to their individual programs, choose methods and forms of pedagogical activity, and provide informational, consulting, and in-service assistance. While such “freelance” teaching has not been legalized in most of the post-socialist countries, it has been de facto institutionalized in the shadow education market across the region.

Notwithstanding many criticisms – for example, the emerging educational marketplace where students have become “customers” and education has become a commodity that could be bought and sold – education “freelancing” has brought many benefits to individual educators. For many teachers, “freelancing” (usually in the form of private tutoring) has become an important source of income generation used to supplement their meager salaries. For many others, “freelancing” has becomes a mechanism to reclaim their professional authority, which has been undermined by the aggressive implementation of (neo)liberal reforms, including the increasing centralized control over school curriculum, a growing emphasis on academic testing, or mounting demands for accountability. In a way, education freelancing has created an education space where teachers (usually in cooperation with families and communities) have the authority to determine what is “good” education for their students. To some extent, it has become a space to resist and sometimes avoid altogether the globally “travelling” (neo)liberal reforms.

Despite being a “protected space” from (neo)liberal regulation and control, however, education freelancing has important occupational consequences. In the context of the market-driven reforms, teachers make individual choices to “survive” economically and professionally by engaging in freelancing activities. And while the (neo)liberal logic of individualism offers an opportunity for teachers to redefine their professionalism and resist unwanted reforms, it remains an individual endeavor and therefore seriously affects occupationally anchored collectivity of teachers in the context of (neo)liberal globalization. In a way, we are witnessing an unparalleled privatization of not only public education, but also of teacher solidarity itself.  

Last modified on Tuesday, 13 November 2012

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Iveta Silova

Iveta Silova is an Associate Professor and Director of Comparative and International Education program at the College of Education, Lehigh University. Her research and publications cover a range of issues critical to understanding post-socialist education transformation processes in the context of globalization, including gender equity trends in Eastern/Central Europe and Central Asia, minority/multicultural education policies in the former Soviet Union, as well as the scope, nature, and implications of private tutoring in a cross-national perspective. She is the co-editor (with Noah W. Sobe) of a quarterly peer-reviewed journal "European Education: Issues and Studies."

Other blog posts

Business, As Usual, Distorts Education (Part II)

Written by
on Tuesday, 10 September 2013

In Part I, I argued that neoliberalism's narrow focus on business and the market system has distorted education through:  blaming education for not meeting the needs of business; marketing entrepreneurship instead of creating good jobs; relying on a very limited human capital framework; and making an unrealistic connection between education and economic growth.  Part II further elaborates neoliberal distortions.   Direct Investment.  Business does not only influence educational discourses, as discussed previously.  Education itself has become big business.  It is…


Reading Mania

Written by
on Thursday, 16 August 2012

Economic crises are usually accompanied by conservative political efforts to cut government budgets.  In education, these conservative forces often push a back-to-basics movement, and today we are seeing that in a global focus on reading.  I recognize the great importance of learning to read for children and adults.  I also recognize that children in developing countries, even with access to primary school, often do not learn to read beyond rudimentary levels.  This has been true for decades, but in the…

blog archive